tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5166935423685123723.post4637925469009534628..comments2023-08-16T05:08:52.996-07:00Comments on Collected Afilliation with Sentient Entities: Dinosaurs, Behemoths and the Great Biblical swindleCASE - now with holinesshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08525074735510880518noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5166935423685123723.post-44032266591479736172008-10-16T02:45:00.000-07:002008-10-16T02:45:00.000-07:00Well Metzeger and Coogan are wrong then (if you're...Well Metzeger and Coogan are wrong then (if you're accurate in your reporting). Make sure you do look it up in the Hebrew and you'll see.Ryan Hemelaarhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17902805101742992509noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5166935423685123723.post-12308953440783015862008-10-15T20:08:00.000-07:002008-10-15T20:08:00.000-07:00Metzeger, Bruce M. (ed); , Michael D. Coogan (ed) ...Metzeger, Bruce M. (ed); , Michael D. Coogan (ed) (1993). The Oxford Companion to the Bible. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-504645-5. <BR/><BR/>says שר (shôr)<BR/><BR/>I don't have a hebrew version of Job on me at present - I will have a look.CASE - now with holinesshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08525074735510880518noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5166935423685123723.post-27563526333681146492008-10-15T02:46:00.000-07:002008-10-15T02:46:00.000-07:00"The word was שר (shôr)"No, it's not. Look at any ...<I>"The word was שר (shôr)"</I><BR/><BR/>No, it's not. Look at any Biblical interlinear for that passage, none will say such a thing. The word used in Job 40:16 is shârîyr.Ryan Hemelaarhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17902805101742992509noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5166935423685123723.post-7941184858554096232008-10-15T02:17:00.000-07:002008-10-15T02:17:00.000-07:00The word was שר (shôr)As I understand it, that sti...The word was <BR/><BR/>שר (shôr)<BR/><BR/>As I understand it, that still defeats the dinosaur hypothesis.CASE - now with holinesshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08525074735510880518noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5166935423685123723.post-29916044516479382922008-10-14T05:01:00.000-07:002008-10-14T05:01:00.000-07:00If the reference was to the umbilical cord, it wou...If the reference was to the umbilical cord, it would have been translated "navel string." It is referring to the muscles of the stomach found in that area. The Hebrew word used there for navel is "shârîyr" -- a cord; a sinew (i.e. muscles). The Strong's concordance # is H8306.<BR/><BR/>The umbilical cord (navel string) is "shôr" (H8270), or sometimes "shôrer" (technically refers to twisting the umbilical cord -- H8326.)Ryan Hemelaarhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17902805101742992509noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5166935423685123723.post-71497530932120535442008-09-25T23:45:00.000-07:002008-09-25T23:45:00.000-07:00A few weekends ago, a friend of mine from Operatio...<I>A few weekends ago, a friend of mine from Operation 513 (a dangerous terrorist organisation) made a statement that Job 40 proves that humans walked the earth at the same time as dinosaurs.</I><BR/><BR/>And it was at about this point--you know, the point where he reached for his book of fairytales in order to present it to you as evidence that humans walked the earth with the dinosaurs--where you should have said: "Stop right there. Stop right fucking there."Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5166935423685123723.post-27938069650869589032008-09-25T23:11:00.001-07:002008-09-25T23:11:00.001-07:00accordingaccordingSean Wrighthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14485575602984697926noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5166935423685123723.post-54822614722024404832008-09-25T23:11:00.000-07:002008-09-25T23:11:00.000-07:00Rather like Muslims ccording to Kafir girlRather like Muslims ccording to Kafir girlSean Wrighthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14485575602984697926noreply@blogger.com